This is the cached copy of http://www.wellington.govt.nz/plans/policies/cycling/pdfs/2008-cycling-policy.pdf

Page 1
Cycling Policy
NOVEMBER 2008

Page 2
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
1
2008
WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL CYCLING POLICY
PURPOSE OF THE CYCLING POLICY
The Cycling Policy (the policy) forms part of the overall transport planning for
Wellington set out in the Transport Strategy 2006. It provides more detail on cycling
in Wellington and the context set by other policies and strategies. It also creates a
framework for the development of infrastructure and measures to improve the safety
and convenience of cycling and cycling facilities throughout our city.
In order to create an effective framework to provide a basis for action, the policy sets
out objectives and policies on how implementation should be approached. These
include emphasising the importance of quality and continuity of cycle routes,
including provision of consistent signage and recognising cycling as a means of
commuting and as a form of recreation.
The policy also details proposals both in general terms for ongoing support (e.g.
promoting the health and recreational benefits of cycling) and as location-specific
improvements to infrastructure. The focus of the latter is to create a safer and more
convenient network in areas where existing provision is disjointed or does not allow
access to key destinations. Providing better facilities for cyclists is also a key
objective of the policy.
BACKGROUND
Whether as a means of commuting, access to activities like any other transport mode
or as recreation, cycling is non-polluting, quiet, and has minimal effect on the built
and natural environment. It is also a healthy form of personal exercise. Moreover,
cycles can be relatively cheap and simple to maintain and can therefore offer mobility
to most sections of the population, including those without access to a car, thereby
contributing towards greater social inclusion. Overall, it can offer a widely accessible,
convenient and environmentally-friendly means of making local journeys, especially
in urban areas like Wellington.
There are a number of different types of bike user which must be considered when
considering a Cycling Policy that caters for all, bearing in mind that people are often
in more than one category. These categories are:
Primary school children - skills aren’t fully developed, little knowledge of road
rules, generally will ride with an adult off-road or on quiet streets
Secondary school children - skills and confidence more developed. Generally
will ride on the road
Recreational cyclists - vary greatly in age, skill and experience. Generally
prefer off-road paths and quiet local streets. Will almost always require on-road
connections to off-road paths and places to stop and rest on route
Commuter cyclists -generally more experienced and prefer the direct road
network. Generally are able to handle busy traffic conditions but do require
space and smooth even surfaces and require appropriate end-of-trip facilities
Utility cyclists - very few in Wellington but will ride for various purposes
including shopping, visiting, and travelling to community facilities. Generally
need less stress routes and require appropriate end–of-trip facilities

Page 3
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
2
2008
Sporting cyclists - travel long distances for training, often in groups and ride two
abreast or in a peloton. Routes often include challenging terrain in rural/outer
urban areas. Primary requirements are smooth, even surfaces and adequate
space
BMX and mountain bikers - BMX riders often use skate parks and require
connections to these facilities. Mountain bikers are generally off-road riders and
use formal and informal tracks.
This policy recognises there are many different types of cyclists with many different
needs. It endorses an interlinked network of on-road lanes and off-road paths in
conjunction with other Council policies, such as the Open Space Access Plan, and
emphasises that quality, well-located facilities is key to making cycling safer, more
convenient and fun in Wellington.
Nationally, cycling has been identified as an important mode in the New Zealand
Transport Strategy it is further supported by the National Walking and Cycling
Strategy: Getting there – on foot; by cycle and more recently by the Governments
Policy Statement on Transport. Regionally the Regional Land Transport Strategy and
the subsequent Draft Regional Cycling Plan (2008) advocate that Council and the
New Zealand Transport Agency develop strategies and review programmes to
improve the pedestrian environment. Council is committed to working in partnership
with these organisations, and this policy will serve as a framework for initiatives to
collaboratively improve the cycling environment.
As set out in the Council’s Transport Strategy 2006, the emphasis for travel demand
management in the City is to encourage walking and public transport as the foremost
modes of transport but recognises some people prefer to cycle. The policy aims to
support these people through the promotion of a safe and convenient network but
also aims to ensure conflicts between different groups is managed appropriately.
The objectives set out in this policy are closely linked with those of the Walking
Policy. The policy reflects this link while also recognising that promotion of cycling
can sometimes cause conflicts with pedestrians. In particular, shared paths for
pedestrians and cyclists are not always appropriate.
Other areas where Council is focusing its education promotion include the roll-out of
new bus priority measures. Council is undertaking a significant programme of bus
priority measures over the next 10 years. This includes the progressive rollout of
bus priority through the Golden Mile, arterial routes and suburban centres (as
proposed in the Draft Ngauranga to Airport Corridor Plan) and presents an
opportunity to create an extensive network of shared bus/cycle lanes. This policy
capitalises on the existing and proposed bus infrastructure and will ensure cyclists
will have access to and be encouraged to use as many bus routes as possible and
the design of new bus routes will cater for the needs of cyclists.
Over the last 20 years we have seen a steady increase in the numbers of cyclists
choosing to cycle to work. This goes against the regional trend and is a result of the
intensification of Wellington’s inner city and surrounding suburbs along with
improvements to cycle technology and an awareness of health and climate issues.
More people now live closer to their work and see cycling as a viable transport
alternative.
Cycling as a commuting choice is far cheaper than vehicle travel given that there are
no fuel costs, no parking costs, no registration fees and less maintenance costs.

Page 4
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
3
2008
With rising fuel costs, it is important alternatives to vehicle travel like cycling are
made safer, more convenient and enjoyable.
Unfortunately, the risk involved with cycling is high. Cyclists are many more times
likely to be involved in a road crash than a vehicle occupant, pedestrian or bus
passenger. Cyclists account for 2.6% of commuter trips but account for 14% of all
road casualties. As a result, one of the objectives of this policy concentrates on
reducing cycling casualties. Making cycling safer and more convenient is expected to
increase its popularity. If successful, future plans will then be able to set targets for
increasing cycling numbers. The NZ Transport Strategy objective is for active mode
journeys to achieve 30% of all trips by 2040. Target levels will be driven to a
considerable extent by the level of investment allowed for.
HOW DO WE MEASURE TARGETS?
It is important that information about the cycling environment and cycle movements is
gathered regularly to inform planning decisions. Analysing changes and trends in
provision and perception aid the policy implementation decisions.
Types of data collected and used by the Council include:
The nationwide census - carried out every five years by Statistics New
Zealand, it gives specific geographical information about the means of travel
to work - including cycling
Cycle counts – the Council periodically surveys the number of cyclists in
various areas related to specific projects
Crash database - this is held by the Land Transport New Zealand and
contains annual reports of all road crashes
Feedback from the public - there is ongoing feedback gathered from public
enquiries and requests, particularly related to the provision of infrastructure
Annual Resident Satisfaction Survey - this survey covers residents’
perception of Council services and can be used to assess opinions on the
quality of the cycling environment
Annual Monitoring Transport Survey Report - a tailor-made survey to assess
the quality of the transport and pedestrian environment
Data trends from the above sources assist with the evaluation of projects and inform
where more work is required.

Page 5
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
4
2008
OVERALL APPROACH
STRATEGIC INTENT
To make cycling in Wellington safer and more convenient for those who
choose to cycle
Wellington Cycling Policy
“safer and more
convenient”
To improve cycle
safety throughout
Wellington
To improve
convenience of
cycling in
Wellington
Urban Development
Strategy & Transport
Strategy 2006
Bus priority
1
2
To improve the
experience of cycle
trips to and from
the central area
3
To improve the
experience of
cycling trips made
to and from
educational centres
Travel
demand
management
5
To improve the
experience of
cycling trips made
for recreation
Open Space
Access Plan
Environment
Strategy
6
Across the board
Specific purposes
To improve the
experience of
cycling trips made
to and from
suburban centres
4
SaferRoads/
Neighbourhood
Accessibility Plans

Page 6
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
5
2008
Objective 1
To improve cycle
safety throughout
Wellington
How will we know we have
succeeded?
Target 1
The Annual Land Transport Road
Safety Report and Resident
Satisfaction Survey show a
reduction in the cycle crash rate
and in the number of reported cycle
crashes and an improvement is
shown in the perception of cycle
safety
What is the Council’s position on cycle safety in the city?
Policy 1.1
Every opportunity to make the city as safe as possible for cyclists must be
explored
Policy 1.2
Cycle-friendly traffic-calming measures will be implemented as required to
moderate motorists’ speeds
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
1.1
Adopt best-practice guidelines for cycle network and route planning
1.2
Regulate for lower speed limits in local streets to provide alternatives to busy
main roads where appropriate
1.3
Deliver road safety campaigns targeting both motorists and cyclists with a
focus on reducing cycle injuries
1.4
Deliver awareness campaigns on the responsibilities of all parties for both
shared cycle/footpaths and bus lanes
1.5
Facilitate a forum where industry and community representative can come
together to discuss cycling issues. This group would assist in planning and
delivering road safety and travel planning initiatives.
1.9
Require cycle safety assessments as part of resource consent applications
for new developments (especially for multi-units and central area)
1.14
Advocate for increased funding assistance rates from Central Government
for the provision and maintenance of cycling infrastructure.
1.15
Advocate that Central Government provide a comprehensive deployment of
Red Light cameras to reduce the instances of failing to stop at traffic signals.
2.2
Determine a suitable methodology for assessing levels of service and assess
all routes identified in Appendix 1

Page 7
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
6
2008
2.14
investigate the feasibility of setting up an 0800 Cycle Crash hotline to report
cycle crashes to inform our work programme
3.1
Provide cycle-friendly sump-grates on the cycle network and cycle-friendly
routes
3.4
Provide bus lanes on key commuter routes as set out in the Council’s Bus
Priority Plan and accommodate the needs of cyclists in the design and
operations of bus lanes
3.6
Provide coloured designated cycle lanes (refer Appendix 1)
RATIONALE
Cyclists pose little danger to other road users, though they are at risk from collisions
with motor vehicles. Consultation reveals people generally do not feel safe cycling on
Wellington roads. High vehicle numbers, vehicle fumes and lack of space for cyclists
are common reasons for this. High volumes of motor vehicles and trucks, as well as
vehicle speed and narrow road widths are also likely to influence the unsafe feeling
on these roads. Intersections and roundabouts are often difficult and dangerous for
cyclists to negotiate. Cycle treatments ending before and starting after intersections
is a common safety complaint. Gravel on roads and poor surfaces are also common
safety concerns as all of these can cause a cyclist to lose control.
There is general acceptance that by increasing the numbers of cyclists on the
network we could expect to see a reduction in the crash rate for cyclists. This could
be attributed by drivers seeing more cyclists more often and adjusting their behaviour
to better accommodate cyclists. More research is needed to better understand this
relationship.
The number of commutes made by cycling in Wellington city has increased steadily
since 1986. Based on this growth trend, it is important the Council makes safety
improvements to key cycling routes and the central area to help making cycling a
safer option. This is especially important given that fuel prices are increasing and
commuters may want to explore alternatives to using their car for commuting.
In 2006 more cycles than cars were imported into New Zealand. It is certainly
noticeable in many areas across the country that there are more cyclists using the
roads than in past years. Consequently the number of cyclist casualties has
increased. Cyclist injuries are not spread evenly across all age distributions as shown
in the chart below.

Page 8
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
7
2008
Approximately three quarters of all injured cyclists were between 20 and 45 years of
age. Compared to similar authorities and all of New Zealand, Wellington has a
unique injury reflecting its particular demographics. For example, there are fewer
child cyclists which is reflected in the injury figures.
Further information regarding 2002-2006 cyclist crashes on local roads and state
highways in Wellington are:
• One death, 47 serious injuries and 225 minor injuries
• The most common crash type was a crossing or turning movement
• 51 per cent of crashes take place at intersections
• 20 per cent of crashes take place at night
• 78 per cent of cyclists injured were male
The chart below shows the reported crash numbers for Wellington city over the last
eight years and the average hourly commuter cycling numbers over that same time.
From the graph it can be seen that reported injuries are increasing at a higher rate
than the cycling numbers.
The Cycling Policy aims to provide a safer environment for cyclists and reduce the
perception of road danger. This will be achieved by a variety of measures including;
road improvements to increase cycle friendliness and programmes to make cyclists
more conspicuous through education and training of road users including cyclists. In
this regard there is often criticism that cyclists ignore the Road Code. The fact that
cyclists are not required to demonstrate knowledge of the law or competence to ride
their bikes means that cyclist education will have a high priority.
The Council uses a stormwater sump grate that runs parallel to the traffic lane and
while there is no significant number of reported crashes resulting from cyclist falling
into these sumps, cyclists perceive these as being unsafe and avoid routes that have
locations where the road “squeezes” them into one of these sumps. Sumps that have
parallel bars are used because of their hydraulic performance; their intake capacity is
almost twice that of a sump that has perpendicular bars. It is proposed that on
nominated cycle routes at locations that cyclists could expect to be cycling adjacent
0
10
0
20
0
30
0
40
0
50
0
60
0
70
0
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
Number of
Cyclists
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
6
0
7
0
8
0
9
0
10
0
Reported
Crashes
Average Hourly Volumes into CBD 7-
9am
Reported Cycle Injury
Crashes

Page 9
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
8
2008
to the kerb that sumps be altered to have “cycle friendly” grates installed, in some
cases this will mean installing an additional sump and lead.
It is proposed to reduce motorists’ speeds in key locations to reduce the conflict
between motorists and cyclists. This includes the central city, Golden Mile and
residential suburban streets. To reduce motorists’ speeds, a combination of lower
speed limits and traffic-calming measures are proposed. It is recognised that not all
cyclists appreciate speed humps or platforms as they can sometimes be
uncomfortable to negotiate. On busy cycle routes other less intrusive forms of traffic-
calming will be used, however these are not as effective in reducing vehicle speeds
so will not be used in all cases.
This policy proposes to place significant emphasis an expanded bus priority network
as a means of delivering a cycle network. In order for this to be safe, we must ensure
the proposed bus lanes are wide enough so cyclists can safely be overtaken by a
bus and cyclists can overtake a stationary bus loading passengers. It will also be
important to ensure both bus drivers and cyclists are aware of each others’
responsibilities when using the bus lanes.
There are a limited number of existing dedicated cycle lanes in Wellington city. It
does not appear that motorists are aware of the significance of these lanes as they
are often driven and parked in. To address this, it is proposed to highlight these
lanes by painting them and to increase enforcement efforts.
When undertaking any works or activities on or adjacent to the roading corridor,
consideration must be given to the effects on cyclists and opportunities to improve
the cycling environment must also be considered. Of all the activities in the corridor,
cycling will be given priority after walking where appropriate.
It is proposed to adopt the Land Transport New Zealand Cycle Network and Route
Planning Guide to assist in developing cycling facilities and to help determine current
levels of service of all routes.

Page 10
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
9
2008
Objective 2
To improve the
convenience of
cycling in
Wellington
How will we know that we have
succeeded?
Target 2
The Annual Resident Satisfaction
Survey shows a greater satisfaction
with the cycling environment and a
reduction in the number of
complaints made to the Council
from cyclists
What is the Council’s position on improving the convenience of cycling?
Policy 2.1
Adequate cycle parking facilities will be provided in key areas where
practicable
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
(see implementation programme)
1.1
Adopt best-practice guidelines for cycle network and route planning
1.3
Provide road safety campaigns targeting both motorists and cyclists with a
focus on reducing cycle injuries
1.8
Advocate for accessible public transport options for cyclists eg carriage of
bikes on buses
2.7
Undertake a feasibility study for the provision of public cycle parking at key
areas in the city
2.8
Undertake a feasibility study for the provision of public cycle lockers
3.2
Provide regular sweeping of cycle network and cycle-friendly routes (refer
Appendix 1)
3.11
Provide way-finding signage suitable for cycling
3.22
Provide improvements to road edges on non-key routes
Proposed actions that depend on the outcome of the investigation
3.9
Provide additional cycle parking facilities in key identified areas
3.10
Provide public cycle lockers, showers and changing facilities at key
locations where feasible

Page 11
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
10
2008
RATIONALE
Improving the convenience of the cycling experience in Wellington is important. The
aim of this policy is to provide good quality, continuous, cycle-friendly routes along
each of the main transport routes to the city, together with a network of links to each
of the suburban centres and access to recreational spaces by utilising bus lanes and
carriageway cycle lanes where practicable.
The policy includes a Key Cycle Routes Map (see Appendix 1) which details existing
cycle routes in the city, existing and proposed bus lanes and key recreational routes.
The policy identifies possible improvements to provide continuity over existing gaps
in the network to make cycling more convenient.
This policy also recognises the importance of some other key routes frequented by
cyclists, and these have been referred to as ‘cycle friendly’ routes.
One aim is to create a network of routes generally suited to the novice and
inexperienced cyclist while exploiting opportunities where possible to assist the more
experienced cyclist using busier roads. The map will be used as a reference
document when planning both cycling-specific and other road improvements, and
roading maintenance schemes. In this way, it is intended that the opportunities to
improve the cycling infrastructure are maximised. Cyclists will, therefore, have
access to and be encouraged to use as many bus routes as possible and the design
of new bus routes will cater for the needs of cyclists.
This policy promotes the use of signage to accompany the cycle network. Signage
should clearly identify what type of route it is, for example commuter or recreation,
and should include primary and secondary cycle signs which assist wayfinding and
inform users of the time it takes to travel to key destinations.
It is recognised that cycle parking at train and bus stations is particularly important; at
Wellington Railway Station there are currently a number of cycle lockers
administered by Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) that are poorly used.
Cyclists tend to leave their bikes locked to poles and signs. GWRC has also recently
announced cyclists can bring their bikes on Wellington and Wairarapa trains free of
charge from July 2008. It is envisioned this will encourage the use of both active and
public transport. The policy proposes Wellington City Council work with GWRC and
rail on such initiatives as well as assist in increasing bicycle parking at all Wellington
railway stations.
Another recommendation is that the Council install secure bicycle parking facilities at
other key destinations. Such facilities could include features such as secure bike
lockers which can be used by commuter cyclists who do not have appropriate
facilities in their workplace, as well as people visiting the central city for other
purposes. Secure cycle lockers could be installed outside fitness centres, in parking
buildings and in Civic Square. The current cycle lockers administered by GWRC are
leased out for six months at a time. It is proposed Wellington city cycle lockers are
short-stay lockers only and available on a first-come, first-served basis. This policy
also considers bicycle parking should be provided at other key suburban destinations
such as libraries, sporting and leisure facilities, shopping centres and community
centres.

Page 12
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
11
2008
The Council will continue to take opportunities to improve and increase cycle parking.
The need for more, well-located cycle parking in the CBD and suburban centres is
well recognised and this policy provides the starting point for getting such facilities in
place. Council is currently trying to reduce the amount of street ‘clutter’, and since
street furniture such as cycle stands adds to this clutter, careful consideration must
be given to finding suitable and safe locations for cycle stands that don’t interfere
with pedestrian thoroughfare, visual amenity and other street furniture demands.
In Wellington city, there is no proactive sweeping of debris from the road. Clearing of
debris is done only on request. It is proposed to proactively sweep an area at the
side of the traffic lane using a mechanical sweeper. It is proposed to sweep all key
routes at least once every two weeks.
There are a number of locations in the city that pose problems for cyclists due to road
construction and sump locations. This cycle policy addresses these issues on the key
cycle routes, however on major arterials that do not form part of the key routes
network, it is proposed that improvements be made to these routes as opportunities
arise through normal road maintenance.
Wellington City Council has been approached by a number of potential operators
requesting support of their bike-hire or public bikes schemes. Each of these
operators would like Council to provide bike parking at no cost to them. This model is
used elsewhere in New Zealand and successfully on a large scale in Paris.
The Council will work with commercial operators to examine the viability of a short
term bike hire scheme with the objective of there being no net cost to Council

Page 13
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
12
2008
Objective 3
To improve the
experience of cycle
trips to and from
the central area
How will we know that we have
succeeded?
Target 3
The Annual Land Transport Road
Safety Report and the Resident
Satisfaction Survey shows greater
satisfaction with the central area
cycling environment, a reduction in
the number of reported cycle
crashes in the central area and a
reduction in crashes for commuting
cyclists
What is the Council’s position on cycling to and from the central area?
Policy 3.1
On main corridors, cyclists will have an option of riding free of general traffic
by using dedicated cycle facilities where practical or by using dedicated bus
lanes
Policy 3.2
Every opportunity must be taken to make improvements to the cycle network
(refer Appendix 1) to make the routes safer and more convenient
Policy 3.3
Those who choose to cycle will have provision for securing their cycle near
their destination in the central area
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
1.4
Deliver awareness campaigns on the responsibilities of all parties for both
shared cycle/footpaths and bus lanes
1.6
Facilitate the creation of an internet-based regional journey planner which
will enable people to personalise individual journey maps
1.16
Provide conceptual support for the great harbour way concept

Page 14
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
13
2008
2.1
Develop cycle parking requirements for central area buildings
2.3
Undertake an ongoing review of signalised intersections to understand
where advanced stop boxes could assist
2.4
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycling routes to central area
including difficult and dangerous intersections
2.5
Identify opportunities to provide cycle routes on the main corridors on
quieter parallel routes to the main trafficked roads
2.8
Undertake a feasibility study for the provision of public cycle lockers
2.9
Undertake a review of signalised intersections to understand where marked
diamonds highlighting signal loops could assist
2.15
Investigate the feasibility of using clearways as a cycle lane on key
commuter routes.
3.4
Provide bus lanes on key commuter routes as set out in the Council’s Bus
Priority Plan, and accommodate the needs of cyclists in the design and
operation of bus lanes
3.13
Provide where possible a suitable road surface on key cycling routes as
identified in the key cycle routes map
Proposed actions that depend on the outcome of the investigation
3.5
Provide advanced stop boxes at signalised intersections where required
3.7
Provide improvements to the road network to remedy gaps in the cycling
network and address difficult and dangerous intersections
3.8
Provide alternatives to main trafficked routes on quieter alternative routes
3.9
Provide additional cycle parking facilities in key identified areas
3.10
Provide public cycle lockers, showers and changing facilities at key
locations where feasible
3.12
Provide painted diamonds at intersections to highlight signal loops and
promote how to use them
RATIONALE
At 2.5 per cent of all journey to work trips, Wellington's rate of cycling is just slightly
above the average (2.4 per cent) for New Zealand as a whole. The cities with
significantly higher cycling rates than Wellington (such as Nelson, Christchurch,
Palmerston North, Napier and Hamilton) have flat topography and wide streets.
Wellington's compactness and relatively good public transport network means
journeys that in other cities might be taken by bicycle are likely to be made on foot or
by public transport. When it comes to the total of bus, train, walking and cycling trips,

Page 15
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
14
2008
Wellington at 40.4 per cent is far ahead of any of the main cycling cities (Nelson is
the best of those, at 17.1 per cent).
Cycle commuting is focused on central area destinations. While 60 per cent of all
commuting trips within Wellington city end in the central area, for cycling this figure is
72 per cent. Therefore it makes good sense to concentrate on journeys between the
suburbs and central area, rather than between suburbs. Appendices 2 and 3 provide
useful maps showing the hourly cycle-volumes and distances in and around the
central area.
The journey to work trip recorded in the national census over the last 20 years shows
that of all the cities in the greater Wellington region, Wellington City is the only one to
show an increase in the number of trips to work taken by bicycle. This increase can
be attributed to Wellington’s compactness and the number of residents choosing to
live close to their place of work, as well as a significant increase in resident
population.
This policy proposes to use the proposed bus priority programme to accommodate a
network of bus/cycle lanes on key corridors into and out of the city. For these lanes to
be useful to cyclists, they must be of sufficient width to safely accommodate both a
cyclist and a bus. As the bus network alone will not always accommodate the needs
for cyclists, it is proposed to identify and where possible remedy gaps in cycle routes
to the central area and to identify and remedy dangerous intersections on the routes
to and from the central area.
In Wellington there are bus lanes and ‘bus only’ areas. It should be noted that cyclists
are currently able to use bus lanes as stipulated in the road code. However, lanes or
areas marked ‘buses only’ are considered unsafe for other road users.
‘Bus only’ areas are considered unsafe because they are designated for bus
operational purposes or used as contra flow bus lanes. Contra flow bus lanes are
only a single lane running in the opposite direction to the general traffic stream. To
pass a stationary vehicle in the lane means the other vehicle must pull out in front of
oncoming traffic. This practice is extremely unsafe particularly for cyclists. Also buses

Page 16
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
15
2008
passing cyclists in the lane would have the potential to knock or squeeze the cyclist
out of the lane. As a result all other vehicles including cyclists are prohibited from
using contra flow bus lanes which are appropriately marked as “Buses Only.”
There are currently three ‘bus only’ lanes in Wellington city: Lambton Quay
southbound from Panama Street to Hunter Street, southbound on Willis Street and
the southbound central lane at the southern end of Thorndon Quay. Thorndon Quay
is restricted because any vehicle travelling in this lane must continue through to the
Lambton bus interchange. This is a bus operating area and for safety reasons all
traffic other than buses are excluded. Other bus lanes are usable by cyclists.
Safe and efficient functioning of shared facilities, such as cycle/footpaths and
bus/cycle lanes, requires a sound understanding of rights and responsibilities on the
part of all users. It is proposed to emphasise cycle awareness in bus driver training,
work with cycling groups to promote appropriate use of shared lanes and include
shared facility awareness in future cycling safety campaigns.
There are a number of locations in the city where cyclists could benefit from the
installation of advanced stop boxes. These boxes are marked at traffic signals and
allow cyclists to go ahead of the vehicle queue to get a head start on vehicle traffic
when the lights turn green. This can improve safety for the cyclist as it allows them to
clear the intersection before turning and before other traffic comes at them. It is
proposed to work with cycling groups and individuals to understand where these
could be installed and to prioritise their installation.
To create a demand at a traffic signal a vehicle only needs to stop at the limit line,
where the subsurface detector loop’s magnetic field recognises the mass of metal of
a vehicle and sets the demand. However, cycles don’t have enough mass to always
register the loop. At locations that only get a demand when triggered, this means
cyclists may have to wait until a car approaches or cross against the lights. It is
proposed to mark on the road a small cycle symbol followed by a series of small
diamonds, thus highlighting where cyclists should position themselves to maximise
the effect on the signal loop. This has been used successfully at a number of
locations in the city but it is not widely used and not all cyclists understand its
meaning. It is proposed to work with cycling groups to determine where else this
could be used. It is also proposed to promote where and how the marked loops are
and can be used.
This policy also proposes a number of cycle- friendly routes that do not have the
same status as a cycle route or bus/cycle route but recognise there are a number of
cyclists who use them. It is proposed to make incremental improvements to these
routes but, at present, it is not proposed to dedicate lanes to cycles exclusively.
The draft policy nominates two recreation routes: the coastal route including Happy
Valley Road and the route through Makara and Ohariu Valley, which are used
regularly at weekends for recreational riding. These areas are important for
recreational cyclists and this policy will ensure their needs are considered when
planning and undertaking work along these routes.
Another recreation cycle route is the promenade along Oriental Parade and through
Lambton Harbour. This route is a facility shared with pedestrians and other
recreational users such as skateboarders and crocodile bikes. While cyclists are
legitimate users of this space, it must be recognised that because, of the mixed use,
the area is not suitable for fast cycling.

Page 17
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
16
2008
In addition, there are a number of opportunities to provide dedicated parallel routes to
the existing cycle lanes or proposed bus/cycle lanes, such as Tory Street, Hanson-
King Streets, Dover to Rintoul Streets and Tawa Porirua stream trail. It is proposed
the feasibility of such routes be investigated.
Appendix 1 shows key cycle routes in Wellington. The existing dedicated cycle routes
are shown as being along Hutt Road, Evans Bay Parade and Cobham Drive and
Buckle Street and Karo Drive. There are also a small number of bus lanes that
provide opportunities for cyclists to ride separately from general traffic. The lanes are
not marked with a cycle symbol to allow flexibility in lane choice.
It is proposed to use the regional online journey planner being developed by Greater
Wellington. This tool will enable users to select an origin and destination for their trip
and include the type of route they would like to take. It is essential for this tool to be
effective the City Council takes a proactive lead in providing sufficient resources and
data for the information to be useful. Once collected and stored in the system, the
information will be available for individuals and groups to produce individualised
maps of routes and areas showing preferred cycle routes and routes with bottlenecks
and barriers for cyclists.
The policy recognises there is a demand for cycle parking in the central city. It is
proposed to install additional bike racks and investigate the provision of cycle
lockers. Cycle parking and access should also be encouraged in private
developments in the central area.
For a number of years cyclists and pedestrians have advocated for a high quality
connection between Petone and Ngauranga. This has been the subject of a number
of studies involving both the Wellington and Hutt City Councils, the Regional Council
and NZ Transport Agency (formerly Transit). Some minor work was undertaken by
Wellington City Council in 1999 to establish a southbound only cycle facility between
our northern boundary near Horokiwi Road through to Ngauranga. More recently the
call for a complete two way facility has been made, from this has grown the Great
Harbour Way concept for a high quality commuting/recreational facility from
Pencarrow on the eastern harbour entrance around the harbour to Red Rocks in
Owhiro Bay.
Wellington City Council supports the concept of the Great Harbour Way as an
important regional connection, while noting that its development would be
challenging and expensive. There is also support for other similar regional
connections such as from the Porirua basin to Wellington CBD.
All these desirable connections should be seen as regional projects and
responsibility for their development lying with all the national and regional authorities
rather than just Wellington City Council.

Page 18
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
17
2008
Objective 4
To improve the
experience of cycle
trips to and from
suburban centres
How will we know that we have
succeeded?
Target 4
The Annual Land Transport Road
Safety Report and the Resident
Satisfaction Survey shows a
greater satisfaction with the
suburban cycling environment and
reduction in the number of reported
cycle crashes in the suburban
centres outside of commuter times
What is the Council’s position on cycling to and from suburban centres?
Policy 4.1
Cyclists will have provision for securing their cycle near their destination in
suburban centres
Policy 4.2
Every opportunity should be taken to ensure cycling is a viable option for
short trips to and from suburban centres
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
1.7
Continue with the area-based SaferRoads programme or Neighbourhood
Accessibility Planning programme to maximise walking and cycling
opportunities in suburban areas
2.6
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycle routes to suburban centres
including difficult and dangerous intersections
3.11
Provide way finding signage suitable for cycling
3.14
Provide additional cycle parking facilities at key suburban destinations
Proposed actions that depends on the outcome of the investigation
3.15
Provide improvements to the road network around suburban centres to
address difficult and dangerous intersections

Page 19
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
18
2008
RATIONALE
Wellington is well served by suburban centres that complement the city centre.
Activities at these centres range from small-to-large supermarkets, restaurants and
bars, takeaway food outlets, health professionals, libraries, recreational and social
centres and neighbourhood dairies.
The short car trip (under 2km) is the most inefficient use of the car. This policy
promotes that those living within 10 minutes’ cycle of a suburban centre will have a
safe and convenient cycle route to that centre.
It is extremely difficult to determine the number of car trips to these centres that could
otherwise have been made by cycle. It is proposed to prioritise these centres and
undertake a survey of residents within five to10 minutes’ cycling range to understand
the demand and reasons why perhaps residents do not cycle. If there is evidence
that more locals would cycle then the Council will be able to prioritise and implement
schemes to improve the safety and convenience of cycling in the area.
It is recognised that cycle parking at train and bus stations is particularly important in
suburban centres as often people will cycle to their local train station or bus stop,
leave their bike and continue their journey on public transport. This policy considers
that secure bicycle parking and/or bike lockers should be provided at key suburban
destinations such as libraries, sporting and leisure facilities, shopping centres and
community services.
Lack of knowledge or awareness of safe routes and connections can deter people
from cycling. This policy promotes the use of way finding signage with approximate
cycle times to key destinations within the neighbourhood.
Council policy on suburban centres is currently being reviewed, and this presents an
opportunity to improve the experience of cycling trips made to and from those
centres. The provision and signage of cycle-friendly routes, and the provision of cycle
parking at suburban centres will be considered in those policies.

Page 20
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
19
2008
Objective 5
To improve the
experience of cycle
trips to and from
educational centres
How will we know that we have
succeeded?
Target
5
The Annual Resident Satisfaction
Survey shows a greater satisfaction
for cyclists biking to and from
educational centres. Council
monitoring shows that all schools in
Wellington have a School Travel
Plan/Safer Routes to School
programme incorporating safe
cycling policies and that tertiary
institutes have an organisational
travel plan that incorporates safe
cycling policies
What is the Council’s position on cycling to and from educational
centres?
Policy 5.1
Every opportunity should be taken to ensure cycling is a viable option for
short trips to and from educational centres
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
1.6
Facilitate the creation of an internet-based regional journey planner which
will enable people to personalise individual journey maps
1.10
Adopt school travel planning programme, rolled out in all schools across
Wellington with the initial focus on primary schools but extended to include
intermediate and secondary schools in the future
1.11
Promote the use by schools of the online regional journey planner which will
enable people to personalise individual journey maps
1.12
Promote, encourage and support the use of the Safer Routes to School
programme and school travel plans
1.13
Work with tertiary institutes to develop organisational travel plans
2.10
Undertake an audit of common routes to and from school to determine
barriers and issues affecting cycling
2.11
Undertake analysis to determine options to correct issues identified in audit
including identifying likely costs. Prioritise works in a way that creates the
potential to reduce car trips to and from school

Page 21
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
20
2008
3.18
Provide a dedicated parking warden to address school parking issues
Proposed actions that depend on the outcome of investigations
3.17
Provide street improvements as identified to improve routes to and from
school ie for safe crossing points and traffic calming as identified in the
school travel plan
3.19
Provide infrastructural improvements where the experience of cycling to and
from campuses is compromised and has been identified in Organisational
Travel Plans
RATIONALE
Educational centres are defined as primary, secondary and tertiary institutes.
Parents driving children to school contribute significantly to congestion during
morning rush hours and create safety problems outside and around school premises.
Children who are driven to school miss out on valuable exercise and have fewer
opportunities to develop good road sense. If parents are to allow their children to
walk or cycle to school, they are going to have to be convinced there are safe routes
available.
Travelling to school often involves trips without adult supervision along busy roads at
peak times. Many school children are keen to cycle to school but are often afraid to
because of the dangers and high levels of traffic on busy urban routes.
This policy identifies education as a priority to help prevent further car dependence
and to make safer drivers for the future. Staff and pupils will be encouraged to
consider cycling to and from school and provide training in safety and security.
Through this policy, Council officers will work with local schools to assess the level of
road safety knowledge to assist the development of initiatives.
The Council intends to use the proposed regional online journey planner being
developed by Greater Wellington, which will enable users to select origin and
destination for their trip and to include the type of route they would like to take. For
this tool to be effective, it is essential the City Council takes a proactive lead in
providing sufficient resources and data for the information to be useful. Of particular
relevance to schools would be the ability to define a desired level of cycling
confidence or ability, and thus the data must have enough detail to assess the
suitability of a given section for young or inexperienced cyclists. Once collected and
stored in the system, the information will be available for individuals and groups such
as schools, enabling them to produce individualised maps of safe routes to and from
school.
Wellington has 76 primary schools and 13 secondary schools and the Council has
worked with 25 schools to develop a Safe Routes to School programme. Experience
has shown each school needs on average $100,000 of infrastructural changes to the
roads surrounding the school to make parents feel more at ease to let their children
walk to school. Unfortunately, current budgets can not sustain this programme but
incorporating it into the larger suburb-wide, area-based SaferRoads programme will
enable the programme to be delivered successfully.

Page 22
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
21
2008
One of the reasons given for not letting children cycle is the illegal and dangerous
parking at or around the school gate. This policy proposes to dedicate at least one
parking warden to address school parking issues.
There are a number of agencies working with schools to help increase fitness,
reduce car dependency and promote road safety. Cycling to school is seen to be a
good way of achieving these, therefore the Council becomes the lead agency in a
multi-agency approach to cycling.
Organisational travel plans (OTP) are similar to school travel plans. There are a
number of organisations that have adopted OTPs. Victoria University has an OTP as
a means of addressing parking and travel issues between their four main campuses:
Kelburn, Pipitea, Vivian St and Karori. The OTP has identified a number of
deficiencies in the cycle network both on their campus and on the surrounding city
streets It is proposed the Council assists in rectifying publicly owned issues and
improves the experience of cycling to and from campus. This will be extended to
other tertiary institutions as required.

Page 23
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
22
2008
Objective 6
To improve the
experience of cycle
trips for recreation
How will we know that we have
succeeded?
Target 6
The Annual Land Transport Road
Safety Report and the Resident
Satisfaction Survey show a greater
satisfaction with trips for recreation
and reduction in the number of
reported cycle crashes on identified
routes outside of commuting times
What is the Council’s position on trips made for recreational cycling?
Policy 6.1
On-road recreational cycling is a legitimate and supported use of the road
network
Policy 6.2
Opportunities should be taken to ensure cycling is a viable option for short
trips to and from key recreational areas and facilities
How will the Council do this?
Proposed actions
2.12
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycle routes to recreation centres
and off road recreational areas, including difficult and dangerous
intersections
2.13
Coordinate planning and delivery with the Open Space Access Plan to
connect communities and recreational nodes
3.20
Provide a suitable road surface on key recreational cycle routes (refer
Appendix 1)
Proposed action that depends on the outcome of the investigation
3.21
Provide improvements to the road network around recreation centres and
off road recreational areas

Page 24
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
23
2008
RATIONALE
The Open Space Access Plan is another key reference document for considering
recreational cycling. This policy aims to improve links to the recreational track
network by ensuring the routes are high quality. A lack of accessible cycle links to
playgrounds and parks results in people driving to recreation destinations rather than
cycling.
Leisure cycling is an important, high-quality way to enjoy local green space like the
Town Belt or scenic routes such as the South Coast and rural circuit, and it is also a
good way to introduce people to cycling for their everyday transport needs. To
encourage more leisure cycling, small-scale improvements are required including
links to residential areas, better signposting, marketing and information. Major leisure
routes and facilities, such as the Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park, continue to
increase the profile of cycling and enhance Wellington’s reputation as a great place to
live, work and play.
While many recreational cycle routes are off-road, there are also many parts of the
road network (especially coastal and rural roads) with scenic qualities that make them
attractive for recreational cycling. Where these routes are cycle-friendly, it is proposed
the Council promote these as part of a wider recreational cycle network.
It is proposed recreational cycle routes have a smooth surface and road-sweeping
and other maintenance policies consider the needs of cyclists.

Page 25
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
24
2008
DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
The draft implementation programme translates the ideals of the Cycling Policy into management on the ground and in the community. The
implementation programme identifies specific projects and programmes (covering the full range of engineering, education, enforcement and
encouragement activities) with cost estimates and timeframes.
The implementation programmes will be included within the Long-Term Community Council Plan (LTCCP) and Land Transport New Zealand programmes
and may be subject to change in accordance with technical, political and financial priorities the implementation programme will be finalised once funding
is approved..
Proposed Actions
Applicable to
Objective ……
When
What will it
cost
1 2 3 4 5 6
safer
convenient
commuting
sub sntr
education
recreation
1.0
Adopt / Promote / Advocate
1.1
Adopt best-practice guidelines for cycle network and route planning
Ongoing
Operational
1.2
Regulate for lower speed limits in local streets to provide alternatives
to busy main roads where appropriate
Ongoing
Operational
1.3
Promote road safety campaigns targeting both motorists and cyclists
with a focus on reducing cycle injuries
Ongoing
$10,000/year
1.4
Promote awareness campaigns on the responsibilities of all parties for
both shared cycle/footpaths and bus lanes
Ongoing
$10,000/year

Page 26
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
25
2008
1.5
Facilitate a forum where industry and community representative can
come together to discuss cycling issues. This group would assist in
planning and delivering road safety and travel planning initiatives
Ongoing
$6,000 /year
1.6
Facilitate the creation of an internet-based regional journey planner,
which will enable people to personalise individual journey maps
2008-2010
$5,000
1.7
Continue with the area-based SaferRoads programme or
Neighbourhood Accessibility Planning programme to maximise walking
and cycling opportunities in suburban areas
Ongoing
Budgeted
for
elsewhere
1.8
Advocate for accessible public transport options for cyclists, eg
carriage of bikes on buses
Ongoing
Operational
1.9
Require cycle safety assessments as part of resource consent
applications for new developments (especially for multi-units and
central area)
Ongoing
Operational
1.10
Adopt school travel planning programme, rolled out in all schools
across Wellington with the initial focus on primary schools but
extended to include intermediate and secondary schools in the future
Ongoing
$50,000 /year
1.11
Promote the use by schools of the online regional journey planner
which will enable people to personalise individual journey maps
Ongoing
Operational
1.12
Promote, encourage and support the use of the Safer Routes to
School programme and school travel plans
Ongoing
Operational
1.13
Work with tertiary institutes to develop organisational travel plans
Ongoing
$10,000 /year
1.14
Advocate for increased funding assistance rates from Central
Government for the provision and maintenance of cycling
infrastructure.
1.15
Advocate that Central Government provide a comprehensive
deployment of Red Light cameras to reduce the instances of failing to

Page 27
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
26
2008
stop at traffic signals.
1.16
Provide conceptual support for the great harbour way concept
2.0
Plan / Investigate / Develop / Undertake
2.1
Develop cycle parking requirements for central area buildings
Ongoing
Operational
2.2
Determine a suitable methodology for assessing levels of service and
assess all routes identified in Appendix 1
2009-2010
$50,000
2.3
Undertake an ongoing review of signalised intersections to
understand where advanced stop boxes could assist
2009-2010
Operational
2.4
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycling routes to the central
area including difficult and dangerous intersections
2009-2010
$20,000
2.5
Identify opportunities to provide cycle routes on the main corridors on
quieter parallel routes to the main trafficked roads.
2012-2015
$20,000
2.6
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycle routes to suburban
centres including difficult and dangerous intersections
2012-2013
$5,000
2.7
Undertake a feasibility study for providing public cycle parking at key
areas in the city
2009-2010
$10,000
2.8
Undertake a feasibility study for providing public cycle lockers
20011-2013
$10,000
2.9
Undertake a review of signalised intersection to understand where
marked diamonds highlighting signal loops could assist
2009-2010
Operational

Page 28
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
27
2008
2.10
Undertake an audit of common routes to and from school to determine
barriers and issues affecting cycling
2009-2010
$20,000
2.11
Undertake analysis to determine options to correct issues identified in
audit including identifying likely costs. Prioritise works in a way that
creates the potential to reduce car trips to and from school
2009-2014
$10,000 /school
2.12
Undertake a study to identify the gaps in cycle routes to recreation
centres and off-road recreational areas, including difficult and
dangerous intersections
2015-2018
$2,000 /year
2.13
Coordinate planning and delivery with the Open Space Access Plan
to connect communities and recreational nodes
Ongoing
Operational
2.14
investigate the feasibility of setting up an 0800 Cycle Crash hotline to
report cycle crashes to inform our work programme
Operational
2.15
investigate the feasibility of using clearways as a cycle lane on key
commuter routes.
Operational
3.0
Provide / action – some actions will depend on the outcome of the
investigation
3.1
Provide cycle-friendly sump-grates on the cycle network and on cycle-
friendly routes (refer Appendix 1)
2009-2014
$25,000 /year
3.2
Provide regular sweeping of cycle network and cycle-friendly routes
Ongoing
$250,000 /year
3.3
Provide bus lanes that recognise the needs of cyclists
2008-2019
Budgeted
for
elsewhere
3.4
Provide bus lanes on key commuter routes as set out in the Council’s
Bus Priority Plan, and accommodate the needs of cyclists in the
design and operations of bus lanes
2008-2019
Budgeted
for
elsewhere

Page 29
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
28
2008
3.5
Provide advanced stop boxes at signalised intersections where
required
2013-2016
$50,000 /year
3.6
Provide coloured designated cycle lanes
2009-2014
$10,000 /year
3.7
Provide improvements to the road network to remedy gaps in the
cycling network and to address difficult and dangerous intersections
2011-2016
$100,000 /year
3.8
Provide alternatives to main trafficked routes on quieter alternative
routes
2016-2019
To
be
determined
3.9
Provide additional cycle parking facilities in key identified areas
2009-2014
$10,000 /year
3.10
Provide public cycle lockers, showers and changing facilities at key
locations where feasible
2013-2016
$50,000 /year
3.11
Provide way-finding signage suitable for cycling
2009-2014
$5,000 /year
3.12
Provide painted diamonds at intersections to highlight signal loops
and promote how to use them
2009-2014
$5,000 /year
3.13
Provide where possible a suitable road surface on key cycling routes
as identified in the key cycle routes map
Ongoing
$100,000 /year
3.14
Provide additional cycle parking facilities at key suburban destinations
2011-2013
$4000 /year
3.15
Provide improvements to the road network around suburban centres
to address difficult and dangerous intersections
2016-2018
$25,000 /year

Page 30
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
29
2008
3.16
Provide way-finding signage with approximate cycle times to key
suburban destinations
2016-2018
$5000 /year
3.17
Provide street improvements as identified to improve routes to and
from school ie for safe crossing points and traffic-calming as identified
in the school travel plan
2010-2019
$100,000
/school
3.18
Provide a dedicated parking warden to address school parking issues
Ongoing
$65,000 /year
3.19
Provide infrastructural improvements where the experience of cycling
to and from campuses is compromised and has been identified in
Organisational Travel Plans
Ongoing
To
be
determined
3.20
Provide a suitable road surface on key recreational cycle routes
Ongoing
$25,000 /year
3.21
Provide improvements to the road network around recreation centres
and off-road recreational areas
2015-2018
$10,000 /year
3.22
Provide improvements to road edges on non-key routes
Ongoing
$50,000/year

Page 31
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
30
2008
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 – KEY CYCLE ROUTES MAP

Page 32
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
31
2008
APPENDIX 2 – AVERAGE OF CYCLE TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Page 33
Wellington City Council Cycling Policy
32
2008
APPENDIX 3 – CYCLING DISTANCES TO CENTRAL AREA